We often hope that things will get better, or at least, not worse. Better or worse actually means better or worse 'for me.' What if we could detach and just accept things as they turned out to be without becoming too emotionally attached to the outcome? How much freer would we be?
The field of stress and stress management has more myths than the traditions of ancient Greece and Rome together.
Why do we ruminate?
There have been many references over the past few years to managers being narcissistic or even psychopathic.
We emphasise that there is no 'good stress', and that all that stress offers is a life that may be shorter and will definitely be more miserable.
A recent TED talk by Kelly McGonigal was an opportunity to demonstrate that the earth is not after all flat.
The research programme that underpins the Challenge of Change Resilience programme was based on the fundamental question in science – what's wrong?
Many models have been proposed to try to define and explain stress, but a common feature is a reliance on capacity.
During the 1950s and 60s two US Naval surgeons noticed a relationship between the number of things that had happened to people and their tendency to become ill.
The NZ Herald recently carried an article claiming that “showing your anger rather than repressing emotions is the key to a successful life at home and at work”.